I am still in love (we'll call it that) with his potential. That must be it. How else can I explain this heartache?
If he was a penpal boyfriend, he'd be perfect. He said the most beautiful things in writing, he could sometimes show his vulnerable side, and there was no sign of a brain injury. We'd keep relations strictly to texting and kissing.
I've romanticized the relationship. He did when we first got together, had big dreams for us, and I was practical- I never said I'd love him forever. Now he walks away easily and I'm crying because I thought my love could help him through this, would bind us together... Or at least I thought being with me was better than being alone.
I don't actually know if he walked away easily. I don't know how he's dealing with this. Me knowing shouldn't matter because it doesn't change the outcome. When I see him, I don't want him. I want him to want me. I want more love poems! Or I want the idealized version of him I construct from those poems....
I just finished reading Secrets of Happiness by Richard Schoch It's not a self help book- it's a look at how religions and philosophers have defined happiness through the ages. It's divided into four themes: pleasure, desire, reason and suffering, and touches on all the major world religions as well as Greek and Roman philosophers. It's a fairly easy read, but you can think about it as deeply as you like. I recommend it. It goes from the superficial into a deeper understanding. It doesn't reveal any secrets- only that happiness is a path that is different for everyone. It's hard to put into words what I got out of it. I cried several times reading it, not that making me cry is much of an accomplishment these days.
I really responded to the section on Stoicism. You probably know what it is- suffering bravely, staying detatched and indifferent to the circumstances. A torturer cannot take your happiness from you because you control your own inner life. It's a lot like Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl's philosophy- (I wrote about him earlier.) The Stoics believed in taking part in public life, and finding happiness in the world rather than retreating from it (like a religious mystic or scholar might do.) They believed in being virtuous and doing one's duty. When suffering came, knowing you were righteous would help you endure it. Aristotle was a little bit more forgiving- he thought not being virtuous when things got tough was part of what makes us human.
Anyways, the point is, I am not very forgiving either. I think people should strive to be good even when it's the most difficult to do so. But it's all theoretical, because I haven't really suffered all that much, and I am not always virtuous. I sure expected Walrus to be, though. Telling someone with a brain injury to suffer bravely is a bit like telling someone with a broken leg to run faster. The tool that controls emotions isn't working. In fact, a broken brain throws one hell of a tantrum when it can't do what it used to.
I should take my own advice- do what's right for him, not for my ego, and endure the pain. Because it will pass. Goodbyes are part of life. If I am crying because I feel fear for the future, that is irrational. I don't know what's coming. I can guess that there will be happiness and suffering ahead. I must seek my own path to happiness, for seeking is finding.
No comments:
Post a Comment